Module: UlePage::SitePrismExtender
- Includes:
- SitePrism, SitePrism::ElementContainer
- Included in:
- Page
- Defined in:
- lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb
Instance Method Summary collapse
- #class_name(my_class) ⇒ Object
-
#define_elements(model_class, props = []) ⇒ Object
can define fields based on the model class usage: define_elements Brand.
-
#define_elements_js(model_class, excluded_props = []) ⇒ Object
instead of the rails traditional form in js mode, there is no prefix before the element name.
-
#define_sub_elements(model_class, submodel_class, props = []) ⇒ Object
if you want to define the element as model1[name] whose id is “model1_model2_name” useage define Brand User define Brand, User, [:description].
-
#element_collection(collection_name, *find_args) ⇒ Object
why define this method? if we use the elements method directly, it will be conflicted with RSpec.Mather.BuiltIn.All.elements.
Instance Method Details
#class_name(my_class) ⇒ Object
60 61 62 |
# File 'lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb', line 60 def class_name(my_class) my_class.name.underscore.downcase end |
#define_elements(model_class, props = []) ⇒ Object
can define fields based on the model class usage:
define_elements Brand
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 |
# File 'lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb', line 25 def define_elements(model_class, props = []) attributes = model_class.new.attributes.keys props = attributes if props.empty? props.map! { |x| x.to_s } unless props.empty? attributes.each do |attri| if props.include? attri selector = "#"+"#{class_name(model_class)}_#{attri.to_s}" element attri, selector end end end |
#define_elements_js(model_class, excluded_props = []) ⇒ Object
instead of the rails traditional form in js mode, there is no prefix before the element name
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 |
# File 'lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb', line 66 def define_elements_js(model_class, excluded_props = []) attributes = model_class.new.attributes.keys attributes.each do |attri| unless excluded_props.include? attri selector = "#"+attri # self.class.send "element", attri.to_sym, selector element attri, selector end end end |
#define_sub_elements(model_class, submodel_class, props = []) ⇒ Object
if you want to define the element as model1[name] whose id is “model1_model2_name” useage
define Brand User
define Brand, User, [:description]
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 |
# File 'lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb', line 45 def define_sub_elements(model_class, submodel_class, props = []) attributes = submodel_class.new.attributes.keys props = attributes if props.empty? props.map! { |x| x.to_s } unless props.empty? attributes.each do |attri| if props.include?(attri) selector = '#' + "#{class_name(model_class)}_#{class_name(submodel_class)}_attributes_#{attri.to_s}" element attri, selector end end end |
#element_collection(collection_name, *find_args) ⇒ Object
why define this method? if we use the elements method directly, it will be conflicted with RSpec.Mather.BuiltIn.All.elements. I have not found one good method to solve the confliction.
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
# File 'lib/ule_page/site_prism_extender.rb', line 11 def element_collection(collection_name, *find_args) build collection_name, *find_args do define_method collection_name.to_s do |*runtime_args, &element_block| self.class.raise_if_block(self, collection_name.to_s, !element_block.nil?) page.all(*find_args) end end end |