Module: BTAP::StructureData
- Included in:
- Structure
- Defined in:
- lib/openstudio-standards/btap/structure.rb
Constant Summary collapse
- @@data =
@author: Denis Bourgeois
Building STRUCTURE parameters, ultimately driving BTAP definitions of e.g.
- internal mass - envelope CLADDING/FRAMING/FINISH selection - related thermal bridging calculations (and uprated insulation levels) - costing - embodied carbon talliesAs detailed a bit further on, this determination is either via user input:
- e.g. "clt" (mass timber) post/beam STRUCTURE, for a school.Or auto-assigned based on the prevalence of model space type assignments:
- e.g. 75% of spaces are commercial in nature (see activity.rb), therefore the building STRUCTURE defaults to "steel" post/beam.The overarching idea is that (in most cases) OpenStudio surface construction & material choices (in addition to internal mass definitions), mostly stem from underlying structural design choices (which aren’t natively defined in OpenStudio). Structural choices have more to do with fire safety, budget, durability & practicality (low-rise vs high-rise), local workforce, on-site vs prefab, etc.
Ensuring consistency between building STRUCTURE, envelope selection, internal mass definitions, etc. is key to harmonizing predicted energy use, peak demand assessments, GHG emissions, vs thermal resilience and embodied energy/GHG tallies.
— —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- — # Although “wood” framed walls constitute the load-bearing components of a “wood” framed building STRUCTURE (e.g. low-rise housing), they can equally be found as non-load-bearing components in a “clt” post-beam STRUCTURE. Light gauge “steel” framed walls are much more common in a non-residential STRUCTURE (e.g. “steel” post/frame, “concrete” post & beam, and even “clt”), though rarely found in low-rise housing. Although one may observe some real-world mixing of STRUCTURE vs FRAMING in a building, it remains largely deterministic: designers select constructions (FRAMING, insulation) while taking building classification and STRUCTURE selection into consideration - the inverse is rarely true.
STRUCTURE description __________ ___________________________________________________________ "steel" steel, post/frame (default) "metal" prefab panelized steel STRUCTURE (**, ++), typically 1 story "concrete" reinforced concrete, post/beam/slab "cmu" load-bearing concrete masonry unit walls, typically 1-story "wood" conventional load-bearing wood-framed and/or -engineered "clt" prefab, post/beam mass/cross-laminated/timber (**) NOTES: ** Neither "metal" nor "clt" options can be considered as fully supported by BTAP, e.g.: - no range of admissible envelope Uo factors - no associated PSI-factors (thermal bridging) - no costing data - no embodied energy/carbon data They are nonetheless (minimally) maintained here as an "aide-mémoire" for future BTAP upgrades - @todo. ++ ASHRAE 90.1 2022 definitions of: "METAL BUILDING": a complete integrated set of mutually dependent components and assemblies that form a building, which consists of a steel-framed superSTRUCTURE and metal skin. "METAL BUILDING ROOF": a roof that: a. is constructed with a metal, structural, weathering surface; b. has no ventilated cavity; and c. has the insulation entirely below deck (i.e., does not include composite concrete and metal deck construction nor a roof FRAMING system that is separated from the superSTRUCTURE by a wood substrate) and whose STRUCTURE consists of one or more of the following configurations: 1. Metal roofing in direct contact with steel FRAMING members 2. Metal roofing separated from steel FRAMING by insulation 3. Insulated metal roofing panels installed per (a) or (b) "METAL BUILDING WALL": a wall whose STRUCTURE consists of metal spanning members supported by steel structural members (i.e. does not include spandrel glass or metal panels in curtain wall systems).Note that there’s a (growing?) need to contrast “metal” buildings against the default “steel” post/beam option. Like a “wood” framed STRUCTURE or a load-bearing “cmu” wall, a “metal” building’s envelope structure and skin are indistinguishable, i.e. no mixing/matching of STRUCTURE vs envelope.
There are of course several other (smaller scale) structural options, often load-bearing envelopes like adobe/hemp/straw bale construction. Most would agree that these are fairly rare occurrences - rare enough to avoid shortlisting them for commercial building stock assessments. One could state the same when it comes to the current (marginal) use of “clt”. Yet as the latter is rapidly becoming a robust low-carbon alternative to “steel” and “concrete” options, its inclusion is justified. Additional options may nonetheless be added in the future.
{structure: {}, cladding: {}, finish: {}, category: {}}
Class Method Summary collapse
Instance Method Summary collapse
-
#data ⇒ Hash
Returns BTAP Structure data.
Class Method Details
.extended(base) ⇒ Object
246 247 248 |
# File 'lib/openstudio-standards/btap/structure.rb', line 246 def self.extended(base) base.send(:include, self) end |
Instance Method Details
#data ⇒ Hash
Returns BTAP Structure data.
242 243 244 |
# File 'lib/openstudio-standards/btap/structure.rb', line 242 def data @@data end |