6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
|
# File 'lib/onceover/codequality/syntax.rb', line 6
def self.puppet
status = true
CodeQuality::Formatter.start_test("puppet-syntax rake task")
inline_ruby = " require 'puppet-syntax/tasks/puppet-syntax'\n PuppetSyntax.exclude_paths = ['vendor/**/*','spec/templates/*.erb']\n Rake::Task['syntax'].invoke\n RUBY_CODE\n #output, s = Open3.capture2e(\"ruby\", \"-e\", inline_ruby)\n output, ok = CodeQuality::Executor.run(\"ruby\", \"-e\", inline_ruby)\n status &= ok\n CodeQuality::Formatter.end_test(output, ok)\n\n #\n # python yaml\n #\n\n # Python gives us \"better\" validation of YAML data then ruby, eg:\n # ```yaml\n # foo: bar\n # baz: clive\n # ```\n #\n # would parse only the foo key in ruby, throwing away the baz key due to\n # a perceived negative indent, whereas python would tell you to fix the\n # file and make it consistent. This is yaml implementation dependent but\n # users would be advised to fix the file, so lets _also_ validate yaml\n # files with python if available on our path...\n if system(\"python --version && python -c 'import yaml'\", :err => File::NULL)\n CodeQuality::Formatter.start_test(\"Additional python YAML validation\")\n script = File.join(File.dirname(File.expand_path(__FILE__)), \"../../../res/validate_yaml.py\")\n output, ok = CodeQuality::Executor.run(\"python \#{script}\")\n status &= ok\n CodeQuality::Formatter.end_test(output, ok)\n else\n logger.warn(\"Please install python and pyyaml for enhanced YAML validation (pip install pyyaml)\")\n end\n\n status\nend\n"
|