Sucker Punch

Sucker Punch is a single-process Ruby asynchronous processing library. It's girl_friday and DSL sugar on top of Celluloid. With Celluloid's actor pattern, we can do asynchronous processing within a single process. This reduces costs of hosting on a service like Heroku along with the memory footprint of having to maintain additional jobs if hosting on a dedicated server. All queues can run within a single Rails/Sinatra process.

Sucker Punch is perfect for asynchronous processes like emailing, data crunching, or social platform manipulation. No reason to hold up a user when you can do these things in the background within the same process as your web application...

Installation

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:

gem 'sucker_punch', '~> 1.0'

And then execute:

$ bundle

Or install it yourself as:

$ gem install sucker_punch

Usage

Each job should be a separate Ruby class and should:

Add include SuckerPunch::Job
Define the instance method perform, which should be the code the job will run when enqueued

# app/jobs/log_job.rb

class LogJob
  include SuckerPunch::Job

  def perform(event)
    Log.new(event).track
  end
end

Synchronous:

LogJob.new.perform("login")

Asynchronous:

LogJob.new.async.perform("login") # => nil

Jobs interacting with ActiveRecord should take special precaution not to exhaust connections in the pool. This can be done with ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection, which ensures the connection is returned back to the pool when completed.

# app/jobs/awesome_job.rb

class AwesomeJob
  include SuckerPunch::Job

  def perform(user_id)
    ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
      user = User.find(user_id)
      user.update_attributes(is_awesome: true)
    end
  end
end

We can create a job from within another job:

class AwesomeJob
  include SuckerPunch::Job

  def perform(user_id)
    ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
      user = User.find(user_id)
      user.update_attributes(is_awesome: true)
      LogJob.new.async.perform("User #{user.id} became awesome!")
    end
  end
end

The number of workers that get created can be set from the Job using the workers method:

class LogJob
  include SuckerPunch::Job
  workers 4

  def perform(event)
    Log.new(event).track
  end
end

If the workers method is not set, it is by default set to 2.

Logger

SuckerPunch.logger = Logger.new('sucker_punch')
SuckerPunch.logger # => #<Logger:0x007fa1f28b83f0>

If Sucker Punch is being used within a Rails application, Sucker Punch's logger is set to Rails.logger by default.

Testing

Requiring this library causes your jobs to run everything inline. So a call to the following will actually be SYNCHRONOUS:

# spec/spec_helper.rb
require 'sucker_punch/testing/inline'

Log.new.async.perform("login") # => Will be synchronous and block until job is finished

Troubleshooting

Initializers for forking servers (Unicorn, Passenger, etc.)

Previously, Sucker Punch required an initializer and that posed problems for Unicorn and Passenger and other servers that fork. Version 1 was rewritten to not require any special code to be executed after forking occurs. Please remove all of that if you're using version >= 1.0.0

Class naming

Job classes are ultimately Celluloid Actor classes. As a result, class names are susceptible to being clobbered by Celluloid's internal classes. To ensure the intended application class is loaded, preface classes with ::, or use names like NotificationsMailer or UserMailer. Example:

class EmailJob
  include SuckerPunch::Job

  def perform(contact)
    @contact = contact
    ::Notifications.contact_form(@contact).deliver # => If you don't use :: in this case, the notifications class from Celluloid will be loaded
  end
end

Cleaning test data transactions

If you're running tests in transactions (using Database Cleaner or a native solution), Sucker Punch jobs may have trouble finding database records that were created during test setup because the job class is running in a separate thread and the Transaction operates on a different thread so it clears out the data before the jojob can do its business. The best thing to do is cleanup data created for tests jobs through a truncation strategy by tagging the rspec tests as jobs and then specifying the strategy in spec_helper like below:

# spec/spec_helper.rb
RSpec.configure do |config|
  config.before(:each) do
    DatabaseCleaner.strategy = :transaction
  end

  # Clean up all jobs specs with truncation
  config.before(:each, :job => true) do
    DatabaseCleaner.strategy = :truncation
  end

  config.before(:each) do
    DatabaseCleaner.start
  end

  config.after(:each) do
    DatabaseCleaner.clean
  end

# spec/jobs/email_job_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'

# Tag the spec as a job spec so data is persisted long enough for the test
describe EmailJob, job: true do
  describe "#perform" do
    let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }

    it "delivers an email" do
      expect {
        EmailJob.new.perform(user.id)
      }.to change{ ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.size }.by(1)
    end
  end
end

Gem Name

...is awesome. But I can't take credit for it. Thanks to @jmazzi for his superior naming skills. If you're looking for a name for something, he is the one to go to.

Contributing

Fork it
Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)
Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add some feature')
Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)
Create new Pull Request