Sucker Punch
Sucker Punch is a single-process Ruby asynchronous processing library. It's girl_friday with syntax from Sidekiq and DSL sugar on top of Celluloid. With Celluloid's actor pattern, we can do asynchronous processing within a single process. This reduces costs of hosting on a service like Heroku along with the memory footprint of having to maintain additional workers if hosting on a dedicated server. All queues can run within a single Rails/Sinatra process.
Sucker Punch is perfect for asynchronous processes like emailing, data crunching, or social platform manipulation. No reason to hold up a user when you can do these things in the background within the same process as your web application...
Installation
Add this line to your application's Gemfile:
gem 'sucker_punch'
And then execute:
$ bundle
Or install it yourself as:
$ gem install sucker_punch
Configuration
# config/initializers/sucker_punch.rb
SuckerPunch.config do
queue name: :log_queue, worker: LogWorker, workers: 10
queue name: :awesome_queue, worker: AwesomeWorker, workers: 2
end
Usage
# app/workers/log_worker.rb
class LogWorker
include SuckerPunch::Worker
def perform(event)
Log.new(event).track
end
end
All workers should define an instance method perform, of which the job being queued will adhere to.
Workers interacting with ActiveRecord should take special precaution not to exhaust connections in the pool. This can be done with ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection, which ensures the connection is returned back to the pool when completed.
# app/workers/awesome_worker.rb
class AwesomeWorker
include SuckerPunch::Worker
def perform(user_id)
ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
user = User.find(user_id)
user.update_attributes(is_awesome: true)
end
end
end
We can create a job from within another job:
class AwesomeWorker
include SuckerPunch::Worker
def perform(user_id)
ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
user = User.find(user_id)
user.update_attributes(is_awesome: true)
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].async.perform("User #{user.id} became awesome!")
end
end
end
Queues:
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue] # Just a wrapper for the LogWorker class
SuckerPunch::Queue.new(:log_queue)
Synchronous:
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].perform("login")
Asynchronous:
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].async.perform("login") # => nil
Stats
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].workers # => 10
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].size # => 23 # # of jobs enqueued
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].busy_size # => 7
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].idle_size # => 3
Testing (Only 0.3.1+)
# spec/spec_helper.rb
require 'sucker_punch/testing'
Requiring this library completely stubs out the internals of Sucker Punch, but will provide the necessary tools to confirm your jobs are being enqueud.
# spec/spec_helper.rb
require 'sucker_punch/testing'
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.after do
SuckerPunch.reset! # => Resets the queues and jobs in the queues before each test
end
end
# config/initializer/sucker_punch.rb
SuckerPunch.config do
queue name: :email, worker: EmailWorker, workers: 2
end
# app/workers/email_worker.rb
class EmailWorker
include SuckerPunch::Worker
def perform(email, user_id)
user = User.find(user_id)
UserMailer.send(email.to_sym, user)
end
end
# spec/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
def send_welcome_email
SuckerPunch::Queue.new(:email).async.perform(:welcome, self.id)
end
end
# spec/models/user_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'
describe User do
describe "#send_welcome_email" do
user = FactoryGirl.create(:user)
expect{
user.send_welcome_email
}.to change{ SuckerPunch::Queue.new(:email).jobs.size }.by(1)
end
end
# spec/spec_helper.rb
require 'sucker_punch/testing/inline'
Requiring this library causes your workers to run everything inline. So a call to the following will actually be SYNCHRONOUS.
SuckerPunch::Queue[:log_queue].async.perform("login")
Troubleshooting
If you're running tests in transactions (using DatabaseCleaner or a native solution), Sucker Punch workers may have trouble finding database records that were created during test setup because the worker class is running in a separate thread and the Transaction operates on a different thread so it clears out the data before the worker can do its business. The best thing to do is cleanup data created for tests workers through a truncation strategy by tagging the rspec tests as workers and then specifying the strategy in spec_helper like below:
# spec/spec_helper.rb
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.before(:each) do
DatabaseCleaner.strategy = :transaction
end
# Clean up all worker specs with truncation
config.before(:each, :worker => true) do
DatabaseCleaner.strategy = :truncation
end
config.before(:each) do
DatabaseCleaner.start
end
config.after(:each) do
DatabaseCleaner.clean
end
# spec/workers/email_worker_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'
# Tag the spec as a worker spec so data is persisted long enough for the test
describe EmailWorker, worker: true do
describe "#perform" do
let(:user) { FactoryGirl.create(:user) }
it "delivers an email" do
expect {
EmailWorker.new.perform(user.id)
}.to change{ ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.size }.by(1)
end
end
end
When using Passenger or Unicorn, you should configure the queues within a block that runs after the child process is forked.
# config/unicorn.rb
#
# The following is only need if in your unicorn config
# you set:
# preload_app true
after_fork do |server, worker|
SuckerPunch.config do
queue name: :log_queue, worker: LogWorker, workers: 10
end
end
# config/initializers/sucker_punch.rb
#
if defined?(PhusionPassenger)
PhusionPassenger.on_event(:starting_worker_process) do |forked|
SuckerPunch.config do
queue name: :log_queue, worker: LogWorker, workers: 10
end
end
end
Gem Name
...is awesome. But I can't take credit for it. Thanks to @jmazzi for his superior naming skills. If you're looking for a name for something, he is the one to go to.
Contributing
- Fork it
- Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b my-new-feature) - Commit your changes (
git commit -am 'Add some feature') - Push to the branch (
git push origin my-new-feature) - Create new Pull Request

