Upsert

MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite all have different SQL MERGE tricks that you can use to simulate upsert. This library codifies them under a single syntax.

Usage

You pass a selector that uniquely identifies a row, whether it exists or not. You pass a set of attributes that should be set on that row. Syntax inspired by mongo-ruby-driver's update method.

Single record

# if you have required 'upsert/active_record_upsert'
Pet.upsert({:name => 'Jerry'}, :breed => 'beagle')

# if you're not using activerecord, that's ok
connection = Mysql2::Client.new([...])
upsert = Upsert.new connection, 'pets'
upsert.row({:name => 'Jerry'}, :breed => 'beagle')

Multiple records (batch mode)

Rows are buffered in memory until it's efficient to send them to the database.

connection = Mysql2::Client.new([...])
Upsert.batch(connection, 'pets') do |upsert|
  upsert.row({:name => 'Jerry'}, :breed => 'beagle')
  upsert.row({:name => 'Pierre'}, :breed => 'tabby')
end

Tested to be much about 85% faster on PostgreSQL and 50% faster on MySQL than comparable methods (see the tests).

Gotchas

Undefined behavior if you use this without properly defining UNIQUE indexes

Make sure you're upserting against either primary key columns or columns with UNIQUE indexes or both.

Columns are set based on the first row you pass

Currently, the first row you pass in determines the columns that will be used. That's useful for mass importing of many rows with the same columns, but is surprising if you're trying to use a single Upsert object to add arbitrary data. For example, this won't work:

Upsert.batch(Pet.connection, Pet.table_name) do |upsert|
  upsert.row({:name => 'Jerry'}, :breed => 'beagle')
  upsert.row({:tag_number => 456}, :spiel => 'great cat') # won't work - doesn't use same columns
end

You would need to use a new Upsert object. On the other hand, this is totally fine:

Pet.upsert({:name => 'Jerry'}, :breed => 'beagle')
Pet.upsert({:tag_number => 456}, :spiel => 'great cat')

Wishlist

Pull requests for any of these would be greatly appreciated:

Fix SQLite tests.
For PG, be smarter about when you create functions - try to re-use them within a connection.
Provide require 'upsert/debug' that will make sure you are selecting on columns that have unique indexes
Make Upsert instances accept arbitrary columns, which is what people probably expect.
Naming suggestions: should "document" be called "setters" or "attributes"?

Real-world usage

We use upsert for big data processing at Brighter Planet and in production at

Originally written to speed up the data_miner data mining library.

Supported databases

MySQL

Using the mysql2 driver.

Upsert.new Mysql2::Connection.new([...]), :pets

Speed

From the tests:

Upsert was 77% faster than find + new/set/save
Upsert was 58% faster than create + rescue/find/update
Upsert was 80% faster than find_or_create + update_attributes
Upsert was 39% faster than faking upserts with activerecord-import

SQL MERGE trick

"ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" where we just set everything to the value of the insert.

# http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/insert-on-duplicate.html
INSERT INTO table (a,b,c) VALUES (1,2,3), (4,5,6)
  ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE a=VALUES(a),b=VALUES(b),c=VALUES(c);

Since this is an upsert helper library, not a general-use ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE wrapper, you can't do things like c=c+1.

PostgreSQL

Using the pg driver.

Upsert.new PG.connect([...]), :pets

Speed

From the tests:

Upsert was 73% faster than find + new/set/save
Upsert was 84% faster than find_or_create + update_attributes
Upsert was 87% faster than create + rescue/find/update
# (can't compare to activerecord-import because you can't fake it on pg)

SQL MERGE trick

# http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING
CREATE TABLE db (a INT PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT);
CREATE FUNCTION merge_db(key INT, data TEXT) RETURNS VOID AS
$$
BEGIN
    LOOP
        -- first try to update the key
        UPDATE db SET b = data WHERE a = key;
        IF found THEN
            RETURN;
        END IF;
        -- not there, so try to insert the key
        -- if someone else inserts the same key concurrently,
        -- we could get a unique-key failure
        BEGIN
            INSERT INTO db(a,b) VALUES (key, data);
            RETURN;
        EXCEPTION WHEN unique_violation THEN
            -- Do nothing, and loop to try the UPDATE again.
        END;
    END LOOP;
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
SELECT merge_db(1, 'david');
SELECT merge_db(1, 'dennis');

The decision was made not to use the following because it's not straight from the manual:

# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1109061/insert-on-duplicate-update-postgresql
UPDATE table SET field='C', field2='Z' WHERE id=3;
INSERT INTO table (id, field, field2)
  SELECT 3, 'C', 'Z'
  WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM table WHERE id=3);

This was also rejected because there's something we can use in the manual:

# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5269590/why-doesnt-this-rule-prevent-duplicate-key-violations
BEGIN;
CREATE TEMP TABLE stage_data(key_column, data_columns...) ON COMMIT DROP;
\copy stage_data from data.csv with csv header
-- prevent any other updates while we are merging input (omit this if you don't need it)
LOCK target_data IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE;
-- insert into target table
INSERT INTO target_data(key_column, data_columns...)
   SELECT key_column, data_columns...
   FROM stage_data
   WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM target_data
                     WHERE target_data.key_column = stage_data.key_column)
END;

Sqlite

Using the sqlite3 driver.

Upsert.new SQLite3::Database.open([...]), :pets

Speed

FIXME tests are segfaulting. Pull request would be lovely.

SQL MERGE trick

# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2717590/sqlite-upsert-on-duplicate-key-update
# bad example because we're not doing on-duplicate-key update
INSERT OR IGNORE INTO visits VALUES (127.0.0.1, 1);
UPDATE visits SET visits = 1 WHERE ip LIKE 127.0.0.1;

Rails / ActiveRecord

(assuming that one of the other three supported drivers is being used under the covers)

Upsert.new Pet.connection, Pet.table_name

Speed

Depends on the driver being used!

SQL MERGE trick

Depends on the driver being used!

Features

Tested to be fast and portable

In addition to correctness, the library's tests check that it is

Faster than comparable upsert techniques
Compatible with supported databases

Not dependent on ActiveRecord

As below, all you need is a raw database connection like a Mysql2::Connection, PG::Connection or a SQLite3::Database. These are equivalent:

# with activerecord
Upsert.new ActiveRecord::Base.connection, :pets
# with activerecord, prettier
Upsert.new Pet.connection, Pet.table_name
# without activerecord
Upsert.new Mysql2::Connection.new([...]), :pets

For a specific use case, faster and more portable than `activerecord-import`

You could also use activerecord-import to upsert:

Pet.import columns, all_values, :timestamps => false, :on_duplicate_key_update => columns

This, however, only works on MySQL and requires ActiveRecord—and if all you are doing is upserts, upsert is tested to be 40% faster. And you don't have to put all of the rows to be upserted into a single huge array - you can batch them using Upsert.batch.

Upsert

Usage

Single record

Multiple records (batch mode)

Gotchas

Undefined behavior if you use this without properly defining UNIQUE indexes

Columns are set based on the first row you pass

Wishlist

Real-world usage

Supported databases

MySQL

Speed

SQL MERGE trick

PostgreSQL

Speed

SQL MERGE trick

Sqlite

Speed

SQL MERGE trick

Rails / ActiveRecord

Speed

SQL MERGE trick

Features

Tested to be fast and portable

Not dependent on ActiveRecord

For a specific use case, faster and more portable than activerecord-import

Copyright

For a specific use case, faster and more portable than `activerecord-import`