Reform

Decouple your models from forms. Reform gives you a form object with validations and nested setup of models. It is completely framework-agnostic and doesn't care about your database.

Although reform can be used in any Ruby framework, it comes with Rails support, works with simple_form and other form gems, allows nesting forms to implement has_one and has_many relationships, can compose a form from multiple objects and gives you coercion.

Development Status

Dear Reform users - you know I love all of you. Reform is currently being improved by myself. I am definitely not resisting all of the feature requests (especially about nesting, model validations, automatic model setup when validating has_many, etc.) but working hard to make it better. Expect a new Reform version and better README mid-late April and please refrain from telling me how lazy I am. Thanks and see you soon!!! :heart:

Installation

Add this line to your Gemfile:

gem 'reform'

Defining Forms

You're working at a famous record label and your job is archiving all the songs, albums and artists. You start with a form to populate your songs table.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  property :title
  property :length

  validates :title,  presence: true
  validates :length, numericality: true
end

To add fields to the form use the ::property method. Also, validations no longer go into the model but sit in the form.

Using Forms

In your controller you'd create a form instance and pass in the models you wanna work on.

class SongsController
  def new
    @form = SongForm.new(Song.new)
  end

You can also setup the form for editing existing items.

class SongsController
  def edit
    @form = SongForm.new(Song.find(1))
  end

Rendering Forms

Your @form is now ready to be rendered, either do it yourself or use something like Rails' #form_for, simple_form or formtastic.

= form_for @form do |f|

  = f.input :name
  = f.input :title

Validating Forms

After a form submission, you wanna validate the input.

class SongsController
  def create
    @form = SongForm.new(Song.new)

    #=> params: {song: {title: "Rio", length: "366"}}

    if @form.validate(params[:song])

Reform uses the validations you provided in the form - and nothing else.

Note that Reform only updates values of the internal form attributes - the underlying model is still treated as immutuable and remains unchanged.

This allows rendering the form after validate with the data that has been submitted. However, don't get confused, the model's values are still the old, original values and are only changed after a #save or #sync operation.

Saving Forms

We provide a bullet-proof way to save your form data: by letting you do it!

  if @form.validate(params[:song])

    @form.save do |data, nested|
      data.title  #=> "Rio"
      data.length #=> "366"

      nested      #=> {title: "Rio"}

      Song.create(nested)
    end

While data gives you an object exposing the form property readers, nested is a hash reflecting the nesting structure of your form. Note how you can use arbitrary code to create/update models - in this example, we used Song::create.

To push the incoming data to the models directly, call #save without the block.

    @form.save  #=> populates song with incoming data
                #   by calling @form.song.title= and @form.song.length=.

Think of @form.save as a sync operation where the submitted data is written to your models using public setters.

Note that this does not call save on your models per default: this only happens in an ActiveRecord environment or when Form::ActiveRecord is mixed in (learn more here).

Nesting Forms: 1-1 Relations

Songs have artists to compose them. Let's say your Song model would implement that as follows.

class Song < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :artist
end

The edit form should allow changing data for artist and song.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  property :title
  property :length

  property :artist do
    property :name

    validates :name, presence: true
  end

  #validates :title, ...
end

See how simple nesting forms is? By passing a block to ::property you can define another form nested into your main form.

has_one: Setup

This setup's only requirement is having a working Song#artist reader.

class SongsController
  def edit
    song = Song.find(1)
    song.artist #=> <0x999#Artist title="Duran Duran">

    @form = SongForm.new(song)
  end

has_one: Rendering

When rendering this form you could use the form's accessors manually.

= text_field :title,         @form.title
= text_field "artist[name]", @form.artist.name

Or use something like #fields_for in a Rails environment.

= form_for @form |f|
  = f.text_field :title
  = f.text_field :length

  = f.fields_for :artist do |a|
    = a.text_field :name

has_one: Processing

The block form of #save would give you the following data.

@form.save do |data, nested|
  data.title #=> "Hungry Like The Wolf"
  data.artist.name #=> "Duran Duran"

  nested #=> {title:  "Hungry Like The Wolf",
         #    artist: {name: "Duran Duran"}}
end

Supposed you use reform's automatic save without a block, the following assignments would be made.

form.song.title       = "Hungry Like The Wolf"
form.song.artist.name = "Duran Duran"

Nesting Forms: 1-n Relations

Reform also gives you nested collections.

Let's have Albums with songs!

class Album < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :songs
end

The form might look like this.

class AlbumForm < Reform::Form
  property :title

  collection :songs do
    property :title

    validates :title, presence: true
  end
end

This basically works like a nested property that iterates over a collection of songs.

has_many: Rendering

Reform will expose the collection using the #songs method.

= text_field :title,         @form.title
= text_field "songs[0][title]", @form.songs[0].title

However, #fields_for works just fine, again.

= form_for @form |f|
  = f.text_field :title

  = f.fields_for :songs do |s|
    = s.text_field :title

has_many: Processing

The block form of #save will expose the data structures already discussed.

@form.save do |data, nested|
  data.title #=> "Rio"
  data.songs.first.title #=> "Hungry Like The Wolf"

  nested #=> {title: "Rio"
         #   songs: [{title: "Hungry Like The Wolf"},
         #          {title: "Last Chance On The Stairways"}]
end

Compositions

Sometimes you might want to embrace two (or more) unrelated objects with a single form. While you could write a simple delegating composition yourself, reform comes with it built-in.

Say we were to edit a song and the label data the record was released from. Internally, this would imply working on the songs table and the labels table.

class SongWithLabelForm < Reform::Form
  include Composition

  property :title, on: :song
  property :city,  on: :label

  model :song # only needed in ActiveModel context.

  validates :title, :city, presence: true
end

Note that reform needs to know about the owner objects of properties. You can do so by using the on: option.

Also, the form needs to have a main object configured. This is where ActiveModel-methods like #persisted? or '#id' are delegated to. Use ::model to define the main object.

Composition: Setup

The constructor slightly differs.

@form = SongWithLabelForm.new(song: Song.new, label: Label.new)

Composition: Rendering

After you configured your composition in the form, reform hides the fact that you're actually showing two different objects.

= form_for @form do |f|

  Song:     = f.input :title

  Label in: = f.input :city

Composition: Processing

When using `#save' without a block reform will use writer methods on the different objects to push validated data to the properties.

Here's how the block parameters look like.

@form.save do |data, nested|
  data.title #=> "Rio"
  data.city  #=> "London"

  nested #=> {
         #   song:  {title: "Rio"}
         #   label: {city: "London"}
         #   }
end

Coercion

Often you want incoming form data to be converted to a type, like timestamps. Reform uses virtus for coercion, the DSL is seamlessly integrated into Reform with the :type option.

Be sure to add virtus to your Gemfile.

require 'reform/form/coercion'

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  include Coercion

  property :written_at, type: DateTime
end

@form.save do |data, nested|
  data.written_at #=> <DateTime XXX>

Virtual Attributes

Virtual fields come in handy when there's no direct mapping to a model attribute or when you plan on displaying but not processing a value.

Empty Fields

Often, fields like password_confirmation shouldn't be retrieved from the model. Reform comes with the :empty option for that.

class PasswordForm < Reform::Form
  property :password
  property :password_confirmation, :empty => true

Here, the model won't be queried for a password_confirmation field when creating and rendering the form. Likewise, when saving the form, the input value is not written to the decorated model. It is only readable in validations and when saving the form.

form.validate("password" => "123", "password_confirmation" => "321")

form.password_confirmation #=> "321"

The nested hash in the block-#save provides the same value.

form.save do |f, nested|
  nested[:password_confirmation] #=> "321"

Read-Only Fields

Almost identical, the :virtual option makes fields read-only. Say you wanna show a value, but not process it after submission, this option is your friend.

class ProfileForm < Reform::Form
  property :country, :virtual => true

This time reform will query the model for the value by calling model.country.

You want to use this to display an initial value or to further process this field with JavaScript. However, after submission, the field is no longer considered: it won't be written to the model when saving.

It is still readable in the nested hash and through the form itself.

form.save do |f, nested|
  nested[:country] #=> "Australia"

  f.country #=> "Australia"

Agnosticism: Mapping Data

Reform doesn't really know whether it's working with a PORO, an ActiveRecord instance or a Sequel row.

When rendering the form, reform calls readers on the decorated model to retrieve the field data (Song#title, Song#length).

When saving a submitted form, the same happens using writers. Reform simply calls Song#title=(value). No knowledge is required about the underlying database layer.

Nesting forms only requires readers for the nested properties as Album#songs.

Rails Integration

Check out @gogogarret's sample Rails app using Reform.

Rails and Reform work together out-of-the-box.

However, you should know about two things.

1. In case you explicitely don't want to have automatic support for ActiveRecord and form builder: require reform/form, only.
2. In some setups around Rails 4 the Form::ActiveRecord module is not loaded properly, usually triggering a NoMethodError saying undefined method 'model'. If that happened to you, require 'reform/rails' manually at the bottom of your config/application.rb.

ActiveRecord Compatibility

Reform provides the following ActiveRecord specific features. They're mixed in automatically in a Rails/AR setup.

• Uniqueness validations. Use validates_uniqueness_of in your form.
• Calling Form#save will explicitely call save on your model (added in 0.2.1) which will usually trigger a database insertion or update.

As mentioned in the Rails Integration section some Rails 4 setups do not properly load.

You may want to include the module manually then.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  include Reform::Form::ActiveRecord

ActiveModel Compliance

Forms in Reform can easily be made ActiveModel-compliant.

Note that this step is not necessary in a Rails environment.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  include Reform::Form::ActiveModel
end

If you're not happy with the model_name result, configure it manually.

class CoverSongForm < Reform::Form
  include Reform::Form::ActiveModel

  model :song
end

This is especially helpful when your framework tries to render cover_song_path although you wanna go with song_path.

FormBuilder Support

To make your forms work with all the form gems like simple_form or Rails form_for you need to include another module.

Again, this step is implicit in Rails and you don't need to do it manually.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  include Reform::Form::ActiveModel
  include Reform::Form::ActiveModel::FormBuilderMethods
end

Multiparameter Dates

Composed multi-parameter dates as created by the Rails date helper are processed automatically. As soon as Reform detects an incoming release_date(i1) or the like it is gonna be converted into a date.

Note that the date will be nil when one of the components (year/month/day) is missing.

Security

By explicitely defining the form layout using ::property there is no more need for protecting from unwanted input. strong_parameter or attr_accessible become obsolete. Reform will simply ignore undefined incoming parameters.

Additional Features

Nesting Without Inline Representers

When nesting form, you usually use a so-called inline form doing property :song do .. end.

Sometimes you wanna specify an explicit form rather than using an inline form. Use the form: option here.

property :song, form: SongForm`

The nested SongForm is a stand-alone form class you have to provide.

Overriding Accessors

When "real" coercion is too much and you simply want to convert incoming data yourself, override the setter.

class SongForm < Reform::Form
  property :title

  def title=(v)
    super(v.upcase)
  end

This will capitalize the title after calling form.validate but before validation happens. Note that you can use super to call the original setter.

Support

If you run into any trouble chat with us on irc.freenode.org#trailblazer.

Maintainers

Nick Sutterer

Garrett Heinlen

Attributions!!!

Great thanks to Blake Education for giving us the freedom and time to develop this project while working on their project.